Mascarenhas, M. N. et al. Trends in primary and secondary infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of demographic and reproductive health surveys. Lancet 381, S90 (2013).
Skakkebæk, N. E. et al. Environmental factors in declining human fertility. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 18, 139–157 (2022).
Bhattacharjee, N. V. et al. Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403, 2057–2099 (2024).
Steptoe, P. C. & Edwards, R. G. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 312, 366 (1978).
Wang, J. & Sauer, M. V. In vitro fertilization (IVF): a review of 3 decades of clinical innovation and technological advancement. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2, 355–364 (2006).
Swain, J. E. et al. Optimizing the culture environment and embryo manipulation to help maintain embryo developmental potential. Fertil. Steril. 105, 571–587 (2016).
Palermo, G., Joris, H., Devroey, P. & Steirteghem, A. C. V. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 340, 17–18 (1992).
Loutradi, K. E. et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 90, 186–193 (2008).
Sunkara, S. K. et al. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum. Reprod. 26, 1768–1774 (2011).
Meldrum, D. Quality control, best practices and variability of IVF results. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 24, 95–96 (2020).
Campbell, A. et al. In vitro fertilization and andrology laboratory in 2030: expert visions. Fertil. Steril. 116, 4–12 (2021).
Fanton, M., Cho, J. H., Baker, V. L. & Loewke, K. A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth rates. Fertil. Steril. 119, 762–769 (2023).
Kim, H. H. More is better: oocyte number and cumulative live birth rate. Fertil. Steril. 119, 770–771 (2023).
Vaughan, D. A. et al. How many oocytes are optimal to achieve multiple live births with one stimulation cycle? The one-and-done approach. Fertil. Steril. 107, 397–404 (2017).
Mendizabal-Ruiz, G. et al. A digitally controlled, remotely operated ICSI system: case report of the first live birth. Reprod. Biomed. Online 50, 104943 (2025).
Hajek, J. et al. A randomised, multi-center, open trial comparing a semi-automated closed vitrification system with a manual open system in women undergoing IVF. Hum. Reprod. 36, 2101–2110 (2021).
Vasilescu, S. A. et al. A microfluidic approach to rapid sperm recovery from heterogeneous cell suspensions. Sci. Rep. 11, 7917 (2021).
Costa-Borges, N. et al. First babies conceived with Automated Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Reprod. Biomed. Online 47, 103237 (2023).
Illingworth, P. J. et al. Deep learning versus manual morphology-based embryo selection in IVF: a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial. Nat. Med. 30, 3114–3120 (2024).
Chinnasamy, T. et al. Guidance and self-sorting of active swimmers: 3D periodic arrays increase persistence length of human sperm selecting for the fittest. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700531 (2018).
Nosrati, R. et al. Rapid selection of sperm with high DNA integrity. Lab Chip 14, 1142–1150 (2014).
Zaferani, M., Palermo, G. D. & Abbaspourrad, A. Strictures of a microchannel impose fierce competition to select for highly motile sperm. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav2111 (2019).
Zeggari, R., Wacogne, B., Pieralli, C., Roux, C. & Gharbi, T. A full micro-fluidic system for single oocyte manipulation including an optical sensor for cell maturity estimation and fertilisation indication. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 125, 664–671 (2007).
Angione, S. L., Oulhen, N., Brayboy, L. M., Tripathi, A. & Wessel, G. M. Simple perfusion apparatus for manipulation, tracking, and study of oocytes and embryos. Fertil. Steril. 103, 281–290 (2015).
Weng, L. et al. On-chip oocyte denudation from cumulus–oocyte complexes for assisted reproductive therapy. Lab Chip 18, 3892–3902 (2018).
Mokhtare, A. et al. A sound approach for ova denudation. F S Sci. 6, 118–125 (2025).
Ma, R. et al. In vitro fertilization on a single-oocyte positioning system integrated with motile sperm selection and early embryo development. Anal. Chem. 83, 2964–2970 (2011).
Heo, Y. S., Cabrera, L. M., Bormann, C. L., Smith, G. D. & Takayama, S. Real time culture and analysis of embryo metabolism using a microfluidic device with deformation based actuation. Lab Chip 12, 2240–2246 (2012).
Lai, D., Ding, J., Smith, G. W., Smith, G. D. & Takayama, S. Slow and steady cell shrinkage reduces osmotic stress in bovine and murine oocyte and zygote vitrification. Hum. Reprod. 30, 37–45 (2015).
Heo, Y. S. et al. Controlled loading of cryoprotectants (CPAs) to oocyte with linear and complex CPA profiles on a microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 11, 3530–3537 (2011).
Mishra, A. et al. Tumor cell-based liquid biopsy using high-throughput microfluidic enrichment of entire leukapheresis product. Nat. Commun. 16, 32 (2025).
Di Carlo, D. et al. Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18892–18897 (2007).
Gardner, D. K., Lane, M., Stevens, J., Schlenker, T. & Schoolcraft, W. B. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil. Steril. 73, 1155–1158 (2000).
The Lancet Global Health. Infertility—why the silence? Lancet Glob. Health 10, e773 (2022).
Ozcan, P. et al. Does the use of microfluidic sperm sorting for the sperm selection improve in vitro fertilization success rates in male factor infertility? J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 47, 382–388 (2021).
Barnes, J. et al. A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study. Lancet Digit. Health 5, e28–e40 (2023).
Eggersmann, T. K. et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with follitropin delta results in higher cumulative live birth rates compared with follitropin alfa/beta in a large retrospectively analyzed real-world data set. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 23, 25 (2025).
Wu, L. et al. The first multiple center prospective study of rhFSH CTP in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology in China. Sci. Rep. 15, 2666 (2025).
Andersen, A. N. et al. Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial. Fertil. Steril. 107, 387–396 (2017).
Polyzos, N. P. et al. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 women. Fertil. Steril. 110, 661–670 (2018).
Huttler, A. et al. Achieving two live births from one ovarian stimulation cycle: the one-and-done approach revisited. Fertil. Steril. 125, 73–82 (2026).
Kieslinger, D. C. et al. Clinical outcomes of uninterrupted embryo culture with or without time-lapse-based embryo selection versus interrupted standard culture (SelecTIMO): a three-armed, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 401, 1438–1446 (2023).
Chambers, G. M., Sullivan, E. A., Ishihara, O., Chapman, M. G. & Adamson, G. D. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil. Steril. 91, 2281–2294 (2009).
Fauser, B. C. J. M. et al. Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature. Hum. Reprod. Update 30, 153–173 (2024).
Johnston, M., Richings, N. M., Leung, A., Sakkas, D. & Catt, S. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection. Hum. Reprod. 36, 624–635 (2021).
Teoh, P. J. & Maheshwari, A. Low-cost in vitro fertilization: current insights. Int. J. Womens Health 6, 817–827 (2014).
Chambers, G. M. et al. The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis. Fertil. Steril. 101, 191–198 (2014).
Mackay, A., Taylor, S. & Glass, B. Inequity of access: scoping the barriers to assisted reproductive technologies. Pharmacy 11, 17 (2023).
Patrizio, P., Albertini, D. F., Gleicher, N. & Caplan, A. The changing world of IVF: the pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technologies. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 39, 305–313 (2022).
Wang, Y. et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation for couples with infertility with non-severe male factor: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 403, 924–934 (2024).
Patel, K., Vaughan, D. A., Rodday, A. M., Penzias, A. & Sakkas, D. Compared with conventional insemination, intracytoplasmic sperm injection provides no benefit in cases of nonmale factor infertility as evidenced by comparable euploidy rate. Fertil. Steril. 120, 277–286 (2023).
Baker, V. L. et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): world report for cycles conducted in 2017–2018. Hum. Reprod. 40, 1110–1126 (2025).
Bárcena, P., Rodríguez, M., Obradors, A., Vernaeve, V. & Vassena, R. Should we worry about the clock? Relationship between time to ICSI and reproductive outcomes in cycles with fresh and vitrified oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 31, 1182–1191 (2016).
Esiso, F. M. et al. The effect of rapid and delayed insemination on reproductive outcome in conventional insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in vitro fertilization cycles. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 38, 2697–2706 (2021).
Cornet-Bartolomé, D., Rodriguez, A., García, D., Barragán, M. & Vassena, R. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles. Hum. Reprod. 35, 2262–2271 (2020).
Duffy, D. C., McDonald, J. C., Schueller, O. J. A. & Whitesides, G. M. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70, 4974–4984 (1998).
Saito, S. et al. Requirement for expression of WW domain containing transcription regulator 1 in bovine trophectoderm development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 555, 140–146 (2021).
Ardestani, G. et al. Effect of time post warming to embryo transfer on human blastocyst metabolism and pregnancy outcome. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 41, 1539–1547 (2024).
