abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF has delivered a dramatically higher one-year return than SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust but with greater price volatility.
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust offers a much lower expense ratio and larger assets under management.
Both funds provide exposure to precious metals, but their risk profiles and underlying assets differ sharply.
Abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (NYSEMKT:SIVR) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (NYSEMKT:GLDM) differ most in their recent returns, volatility, and cost—SIVR has posted a much higher one-year return and higher beta, while GLDM stands out for its lower fee and larger assets under management (AUM).
Both SIVR and GLDM are physically backed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) designed to give investors exposure to precious metals—silver and gold, respectively—without the need for direct ownership or storage. This comparison examines their cost, performance, risk, and composition to help readers determine which may better fit specific portfolio needs.
Metric | SIVR | GLDM |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | Aberdeen Investments | SPDR |
Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.10% |
1-yr return (as of 2026-01-13) | 184.0% | 68.9% |
Beta | 1.44 | 0.51 |
AUM | $5.4 billion | $25.2 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
GLDM is more affordable on fees, charging just 0.10% annually versus SIVR’s 0.30%, which could appeal to cost-conscious investors. Yield is not a factor in this comparison, as neither fund reports a dividend payout.
Metric | SIVR | GLDM |
|---|---|---|
Max drawdown (5 y) | -38.61% | -20.92% |
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years | $3,149 | $2,427 |
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust is designed to track the performance of gold bullion, offering investors a low-cost and accessible way to gain gold exposure. The fund is over seven years old and has amassed $26.8 billion in assets under management (AUM). Details on individual holdings are not disclosed, but the fund’s focus is straightforward: gold bullion.
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF, in contrast, targets the price of physical silver, with no reported sector breakdown or disclosed top holdings, but its purpose is similar—to mirror the silver spot price as closely as possible. Neither fund employs leverage, hedging, or other structural quirks, making both relatively simple options for metals exposure.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Source: finance.yahoo.com