Investing advice often sounds deceptively simple: invest regularly, stay patient, avoid panic. Yet, when markets fall, many investors do precisely the opposite. Ripsy Bondia, assistant professor at IMI Delhi, explains why knowing what to do is often easier than actually doing it.
During the 2008-09 financial crisis, broader indices fell 60-65%. Equity mutual-fund flows moved from net inflows of ₹12,700 crore in January 2008 to net outflows of ₹2,100 crore in December 2009.
More recently, despite no major crash and near-zero market returns over the past two years, monthly equity mutual fund inflows fell by nearly 30%, from ₹40,600 crore in June 2024 to ₹29,000 crore in June 2026.
Understanding this behaviour requires a simple two-by-two grid. The horizontal axis measures intellectual complexity, from simple to complex. The vertical axis measures emotional difficulty, from easy to difficult.
The bottom-left quadrant contains decisions that are both intellectually simple and emotionally easy. Wearing a seatbelt or setting an alarm requires little thought and usually encounters little emotional resistance.
The bottom-right quadrant covers decisions that are intellectually complex but emotionally easy. Following a detailed recipe or analysing market trends may demand concentration. But the process can feel engaging and provide a sense of progress.
The top-right quadrant contains decisions that are both intellectually complex and emotionally difficult. Choosing a career, raising children or navigating a major life transition requires careful judgment while carrying significant emotional weight.
The top-left quadrant is especially relevant to investing. It contains decisions that are intellectually simple but emotionally difficult. Eating healthily, exercising regularly, going to bed on time and saving money all belong here. We generally know what to do but struggle to do it consistently.
The obstacle in this quadrant is not knowledge but execution. People delay or avoid these actions not because the instructions are unclear, but because following them can feel uncomfortable.
Investing through systematic investment plans (SIPs) sits squarely in this simple-but-emotionally-difficult quadrant. The principle is straightforward: invest a fixed amount every month, regardless of market conditions, and remain invested for the long term.
Investment during market crisis
Following that principle during bloodbaths on Dalal Street, however, is far from easy.
During the 2008 crisis, the Sensex plummeted nearly 60% in less than 10 months. An investor who put ₹10 lakh into an index fund at the peak would have seen its value fall to about ₹4 lakh.
Similarly, during the pandemic crash, the Sensex fell nearly 40% in just two months. Investors don’t just watch portfolios shrink; they experience fear.
Conversations with friends, colleagues and other investors can amplify this anxiety, particularly when panic spreads through social media and messaging groups. News headlines, expert commentary and app notifications can intensify the uncertainty.
Investors start to question whether continuing their SIPs is prudent or reckless. Concerns about job security, medical emergencies, and the possibility of needing money while markets remain depressed add to the anxiety.
In such moments, simple advice to “stay invested” becomes emotionally challenging. It requires enduring volatility while standing apart from panicking crowds.
Investors must accept that decisions might appear wrong for extended periods. Buying during downturns rarely feels like an opportunity in real time. Only in hindsight do such moments reveal themselves as advantageous.
This represents investing’s central tension: crucial actions remain simple yet emotionally demanding. Continuing SIPs or investing during downturns requires emotional resilience.
The next time you review your portfolio, place each decision on the grid and ask: “Am I avoiding this because it is financially unsound, or simply because it is emotionally uncomfortable?”
In investing, the greatest advantage often comes not from mastering complexity, but from consistently doing a few simple things well.
